A man who was once a parishioner of SGG (St. Gertrude the Great Church),
and who had become thoroughly disgusted with Dolan and Cekada – especially for
their part in the events of 2007-2009, left SGG shortly thereafter. He deplored what they had done so much,
that he even wrote articles (one of which will be quoted from later) about it
-- as did others -- on a dissident website (“sgginfo). He also had another, particularly personal reason to detest everything
that they stood for: he had a daughter who was on both a respirator and a
feeding tube at about the time when Cekada was trumpeting out his Schiavo travesty about how “painful” it
was to have “a hole poked in you, a tube shoved in and then
having to eat and drink that way [that] would be burdensome for any normal man.”
If this man had taken Phony Tony’s advice, his daughter would have died within days. Fortunately, he didn’t. (As just about the whole world knows, what Cekada said about
Schiavo was utter nonsense – and a
complete pack of lies.) So, for
this and the other aforementioned reasons, this parishioner left SGG, resolving
never to return. He then joined
the scores of others who had left because of those same abuses of 2007-2009, and who
had formed the new parish: St. Albert the Great (SAG). Another parishioner, who had left SGG
for similar reasons, also joined up with the SAG
congregation.
However, both of them are now back at SGG. Why? The answer
is simple: flattery. The dynamic duo enticed them back with
what has always worked for them: dazzling them with “the show.” In both cases, it took the form of
putting on an elaborate funeral for a family member of each man: in the one
case, a deceased wife; and in the other, a deceased daughter. In each instance, the parishioner fell
for the dynamic duo’s naked, unabashed flattery, trading his principles and
self-respect in return for a fleeting bit of pompous, pretentious (and insincere)
adulation.
The funeral for the one parishioner’s wife was particularly
ostentatious: three priests (yes, three
priests) “simul-celebrating” Masses for the deceased (yes -- all at the same
time) – something never done before (or since) for anyone at SGG.
What was particularly ironic about this was the fact
that the deceased detested both Dolan and Cekada. Not only that: while she was alive, she regularly attended a
Novus Ordo church; she habitually never set foot inside SGG. But why all the hoopla? Why did Dannie and Tony put on their
“three-ring circus” for someone who absolutely couldn’t stand them? That answer is simple too: it wasn’t
done for her; it was done for the husband.
He, like so many others who were (rightfully) outraged at Dolan’s,
Cekada’s, and their SGG school principal’s disgusting behavior, left there to
join the congregation at SAG; but he always harbored a lingering taste for “the
show” – SGG’s elaborate rites and rubrics – which SAG couldn’t match. He, who was also a board member of SAG, had some points of disagreement with SAG’s pastor, culminating in him
resigning from the board. This
combination – his love of “the show” and his disenchantment with SAG’s pastor
(coupled with the fact that his son’s family was still at SGG) – eventually
caused him to return to SGG. It was probably the former that was the overriding
factor: he was absolutely enamored with all the pomp and ceremony that went
with “the show,” and was probably looking for some pretense to return. The friction with SAG’s pastor provided
that pretense. It was a classic
case of leaving SGG for the right
reasons, but returning for the wrong
reasons.
Since this parishioner’s “returning to the fold” was a good public
relations coup for Deacon Dannie – and as a “reward” for him having done so –
Dannie then exploited it by putting on his shameless, over-the-top “triple
play” pageantry – unprecedented in the history of SGG – for a woman who
absolutely loathed him: the ultimate
triumph of “show” over substance.
Another probable reason for this bit of brazenness was the fact that
this parishioner “has some bucks” and hence represents a potential source of
substantial revenue for the dynamic duo.
So, to ensure that his returning prodigal son was sufficiently “reconciled,”
he felt the need for “something big” to “seal the deal” – therefore, the
“triple-play” tomfoolery. Let us
hope that the parishioner’s conscience eventually supersedes his appetite for
flattery, and that he comes to see their maneuver for the calculated ruse that
it was.
In the case of the other parishioner (the one whose daughter was routinely nourished for decades on that feeding
tube that Phony Tony so vehemently eschewed as prohibitively “painful”), it
was also, as we said, a funeral Mass that was the bait that brought him
back to SGG. And, like the
“triple-play Mass” parishioner, this man too was always enamored with “the
show” – especially the “polyphonic music” part of it. Also like the other parishioner, he had left SGG in disgust
(he even wrote several articles for an anti-SGG website, lambasting Dolan,
Cekada, and SGG’s school principal), supposedly resolving never to return). The funeral Mass was for the man’s
daughter, who finally succumbed to the genetic heart condition that
necessitated her feeding tube (as well as a respirator).
For this parishioner, it was probably the “polyphonic music” that
provided the primary impetus to drive him back into Dannie’s arms: he was at
one time SGG’s choir director, and then SAG’s later on. When SAG liquidated, he then went to
“IC” (Immaculate Conception Church), hoping to get the job there. But IC already had a choir director, so he was relegated to “second fiddle” there
(which didn’t fill his needs). His
daughter’s funeral thus provided the “opening” to let him return to SGG in a
quasi face-saving way, plus get his old job back. I say “quasi” face-saving way, because here is a man who
(apparently) thoroughly burned his
bridges with Dannie and Tony; and it would seem that any return to SGG
would be an embarrassing, “tail-between-the-legs”: ordeal for him, in light of
what he had said about them in the past.
For instance, in a letter to the late Fr. Stepanich, he spoke of the SGG
school principal’s “criminal abuses and the SGG clergy’s consent to his
iniquitous and soul-destroying words and actions (all publicly proven in the
objective, external forum).” He
further added that the principal “has abused, psychologically and even
physically, many of the children put into his charge at SGG school. Parents and teachers have prayed (as
you [Fr. Stepanich] suggested) and reported the abuses to the pastor and
assistant pastor, who both have refused to this day to take any substantive
action to correct the abuses. On
the contrary, those who have tried to
protect their children have been privately, and even publicly, castigated and
even thrown out of the school and/or parish” [his italics].
And,
as if that wasn’t damning enough, he added, “How is it even possible the
horrendous crime of child abuse, practiced and rewarded by the perverts of the Novus
Ordo, is repeated in our own midst! How is it possible that certain
priests show an utter lack of compassion for children, let alone their
struggling parents! I
personally believe that such an utter lack of basic human compassion, as
typified by Bp. Dolan and even more especially Fr. Cekada, is a very real sign
of demonic possession”
[again, his italics].
In addition to the foregoing (from his letter to Fr.
Stepanich), this man wrote even more damning testimony against Dolan and Cekada. Yet, here he is, once again, swallowing
his pride (and his integrity) and “sucking up” to them, because his penchant
for polyphonic music outweighs his principles. Apparently, he can conveniently forget what he publicly stated in the past, and can "let bygones be bygones” for the sake of being reinstated as choir director. What makes his behavior all the more despicable is that he made similar allegations against an
INNOCENT man (Bp. Paul Petko) -- which were proven to be patently false (but for
which he has never recanted) -- yet he can “forgive and forget” when it comes to
the serpents of SGG, whose wrongdoing has been proven to be patently
true. This is hypocrisy on
a scale that puts this man in a category all by himself.
What motivates men such as these two to utterly abrogate and prostitute
their Christian principles? What
motivates them to crawl on their bellies back to the serpentine “shepherds” of
SGG? Again, it’s flattery – and it is appearances, “the show” – that count.
What also counts is having a short memory. These two men conveniently FORGOT (or knowingly ignored) the heinous behavior of Dolan and Cekada because they
wanted something. They didn’t care
about what Dolan and Cekada are, and what
they stood for – as long as they got what they wanted. They chose to “forgive and forget” –
not for the sake of forgiveness, but
purely for the sake of forgetfulness. Their interest was in expediency, not ethics – and in serving
themselves, not God.
Are they alone -- are they unique -- in this regard? Not by a long shot: several others have
emulated their behavior. It is a
sad fact that many who have sworn they’d “never go back to that place” are
often seen back there on SGG’s doorstep.
They decide to go back “occasionally”; and their reason for doing so is
that “they do a good job there.”
This is a NON-reason. And,
in a way, these people are even more hypocritical
and cowardly than the two illustrated in this article, for these two had at
least some vested (albeit selfish) interest in doing what they
did. Those who come back
“occasionally” (for whatever reason) have no reason whatsoever (other than the
pomp and the pageantry). Their
behavior is, at best, irrational –
especially considering the fact that they have several viable and legitimate alternatives elsewhere.
The only “good job” that they can expect the SGG clerics to
do is that of emptying their wallets
– and, ultimately, emptying their souls; and all they are
accomplishing by “occasionally” going to SGG is to aid and abet these hucksters -- to reinforce their behavior, and to
reinforce the false impression in the minds of SGG’s parishioners that they are
“legitimate.” The only “safe” way for the “occasional” visitor
to SGG is to stay away.
Going back there “every now and then” or “for old time’s sake” is,
again, only enabling these vipers to continue their mischief. The only real thing to do is simply not to go there – to STAY AWAY. As another website
so aptly admonishes, STARVE THE BEAST.
I am sure that Dolan and Cekada think that getting back those two
parishioners (and, occasionally, the other “part-timers”) was a public relations masterstroke
on their part. Or was it? These people may have been “won over”
for now, but the memory of the dynamic duo’s track record still lingers in their
minds; it may be “in remission,” but it has not gone away. One day, Dolan and Cekada will
inevitably overstep their bounds (because tigers do not change their stripes);
and these two, who were foolish enough to take the vipers’ bait this time
around, will not – let us hope -- be fooled the next time. They will see through the “tinsel” and
once again discover that there is no “tree” there – no substance. They’ll see the dynamic duo for what
they always have been and continue to be: a couple of self-seeking profiteers
-- a sham.
This, of course, is something that they should have recognized long
before – and probably did. But
flattery is a powerful thing, as is the glitz and emotional appeal of “the
show.” It deceives people, it
blinds them, and it causes the weak-willed to relapse. That is why it is used so often: because it works – and it worked on
them. No matter how nakedly
obvious, no matter how insincere, no matter how amateurishly done, flattery
always seems to work. For the
brain-dead, it works just about every time. But for those with any spark of intelligence and principles left in them, it shouldn’t –
at least the second time around.
Let us hope that for those two parishioners – and those “part-timers”
who occasionally “window shop” at SGG – that on their “second time around,” they’ll have the wits to “see through
the tinsel,” and the strength of character to lay aside their self-interest
(and their pride) and act on that conviction. In the end, their spiritual survival may well depend upon
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment